一、薄膜捆包機與三維包(bao)裝機在節電節材的(de)比較

1、耗(hao)電(dian)(dian)比較:三(san)維機每小(xiao)時(shi)耗(hao)電(dian)(dian)量4千瓦(wa)/小(xiao)時(shi),而(er)捆包(bao)機僅有0.8千瓦(wa)/小(xiao)時(shi), 每年節電(dian)(dian)為：0.8元(yuan)/度電(dian)(dian)×(4-0.8)×8小(xiao)時(shi)/班×26 天(tian)/月×11月/年=7321.00元(yuan)。

2、包(bao)(bao)材比較:捆扎(zha)機目前(qian)采(cai)用有紙(zhi)帶(dai)(dai)和PP帶(dai)(dai)兩種,按(an)包(bao)(bao)裝(zhuang)物尺寸為(wei)300×200×80計算,用薄膜節約成(cheng)本為(wei):三(san)維機每(mei)(mei)只(zhi)0.12元(yuan)、捆包(bao)(bao)機每(mei)(mei)只(zhi)0.028元(yuan)，按(an)捆包(bao)(bao)機每(mei)(mei)分(fen)鐘(zhong)30包(bao)(bao)計算全年節省包(bao)(bao)裝(zhuang)材料為(wei)：(0.12-0.028)元(yuan)/包(bao)(bao)×30包(bao)(bao)/分(fen)鐘(zhong)×60分(fen)鐘(zhong)/小(xiao)時(shi)(shi)(shi)×8小(xiao)時(shi)(shi)(shi)/班×26天/月×11月/年=378892.00元(yuan)。用紙(zhi)帶(dai)(dai)成(cheng)本節約為(wei):三(san)維機每(mei)(mei)只(zhi)0.12元(yuan)、捆包(bao)(bao)機每(mei)(mei)只(zhi)0.05元(yuan)，按(an)捆包(bao)(bao)機每(mei)(mei)分(fen)鐘(zhong)30包(bao)(bao)計算全年節省包(bao)(bao)裝(zhuang)材料為(wei)：(0.12-0.05)元(yuan)/包(bao)(bao)×30包(bao)(bao)/分(fen)鐘(zhong)×60分(fen)鐘(zhong)/小(xiao)時(shi)(shi)(shi)×8小(xiao)時(shi)(shi)(shi)/班×26天/月×11月/年=110880.00元(yuan)。

3、如果產品(pin)為(wei)單盒包(bao)裝或需要完(wan)全封閉包(bao)裝則適宜采用(yong)三維機。

二、薄膜捆包機與(yu)熱收縮機的耗電包材比較(jiao)

1、耗(hao)(hao)電(dian)比較: 熱收(shou)縮機(ji)每(mei)小(xiao)時(shi)(shi)耗(hao)(hao)電(dian)量約(yue)在8千(qian)(qian)瓦(wa)/小(xiao)時(shi)(shi),而(er)捆包機(ji)僅(jin)有0.8千(qian)(qian)瓦(wa)/小(xiao)時(shi)(shi), 每(mei)年節省(sheng)電(dian)=0.8元(yuan)/每(mei)度電(dian)×(8-0.8)×8小(xiao)時(shi)(shi)/班×26 天/月×11月/年=13178元(yuan)。

2、包(bao)(bao)(bao)材比較: 按同(tong)樣包(bao)(bao)(bao)裝尺寸(cun)為95×95×75計(ji)(ji)算包(bao)(bao)(bao)裝材料（薄膜）成(cheng)本(ben)，熱收縮機(ji)每(mei)只0.06元(yuan)、捆包(bao)(bao)(bao)機(ji)每(mei)只0.015元(yuan)，按捆包(bao)(bao)(bao)機(ji)每(mei)分(fen)(fen)鐘30包(bao)(bao)(bao)計(ji)(ji)算全年節省成(cheng)本(ben)為：(0.06-0.015)元(yuan)/包(bao)(bao)(bao)×30包(bao)(bao)(bao)/分(fen)(fen)鐘×60分(fen)(fen)鐘/小時×8小時/班(ban)×26天/月×11月/年=185328.00元(yuan)。